Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 213
Sanjay Kumar
Pawan Parkash
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
the impugned orders dated 21.3.2017 (Annexure P (Annexure P Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Kaithal vide which the obje petitioner/Judgment Debtor have been dismissed.
fairly submits that the main Execution Petition pending before the learned Executing Court stands dismissed for non therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of accordingly at this stage.
August 29 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No.5506 of 2018 (O & M)
Date of decision : Sanjay Kumar Versus Pawan Parkash
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present revision petition is for setting aside of the impugned orders dated 21.3.2017 (Annexure P (Annexure P-10) and order dated 27.7.2018 (Annexure P Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Kaithal vide which the obje petitioner/Judgment Debtor have been dismissed.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the main Execution Petition pending before the learned Executing Court stands dismissed for non-prosecutio therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of accordingly at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 9, 2025
Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.5506 of 2018 (O & M) Date of decision :-29.08.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Sandeep Goyal, Advocate Prayer in the present revision petition is for setting aside of the impugned orders dated 21.3.2017 (Annexure P-9), dated 03.7.2018 10) and order dated 27.7.2018 (Annexure P-11) passed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Kaithal vide which the objections filed by the petitioner/Judgment Debtor have been dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that the main Execution Petition pending before the learned prosecution. It is submitted that therefore, the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of accordingly at this stage. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.08.29 18.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document