RAKESH NAYAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/690/2025 · 2025-07-14
Pankaj Bhatia
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150542 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150542 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39989 Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 690 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rakesh Nayak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava on behalf of opposite party no.6 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the opposite party no.6.
3. The present petition has been filed as a public interest litigation.
4. Learned Counsel for the respondent no.6 states that the litigation is going on in between the respondent and the father of the petitioner herein, on which contempt petition has also been filed.
5. The abovesaid facts have been concealed in the present writ petition, which has been filed as a public interest litigation. Clearly the affidavit filed is a wrong affidavit and the averments in para 5 are wrong to the knowledge of the petitioner, as such, the present petition deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed with a cost of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent no.6.
6. In case, the said amount is not paid within a month from today, the District Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar shall recover the same as arrears of land revenue and shall pay the same to the respondent no.6 forthwith. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench