W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.08.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 K.Vanaja Kathirine ... Petitioner versus 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by is The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch Office, Superintendent of Police Office Building, Nagercoil – 629 001 Kanyakumari District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Thiruvattar, Kanyakumari District. 4. Subha ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd and 3rd 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R1 to R3 : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner has lodged a complaint on 15.02.2025 and also filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent Police to take action based on her complaint dated 15.02.2025. 2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the complaint of the petitioner before the Superintendent of Police has been forwarded to the Kottar Police Station and the same was treated as current paper in C.No.P2/NIPS/Ngi/341/2024 and after the enquiry, the same was closed on 10.07.2025 as it is civil in nature. 3. This Court considered the rival submissions made. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 4. There is no mode of enquiry as current paper enquiry. However, the enquiry appears to have been conducted as current paper enquiry without even registering the complaint in any register. 5. The respondent Police claims that since the petitioner's complaint is civil in nature, they have closed the same on 10.07.2025. Therefore, this writ petition is closed with a direction to the respondent Police to furnish a copy of the closure report to the petitioner to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. 05.08.2025 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch Office, Superintendent of Police Office Building, Nagercoil – 629 001 Kanyakumari District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy 3. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Thiruvattar, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. W.P.Crl.(MD)No.603 of 2025 05.08.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis