RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA AND 2 OTHERS v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
A227/4066/2025 · 2025-07-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39434 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4066 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Maurya And 2 Others Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Sultanpur And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Maurya,Priyanshi Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to respondent No. 1-Deputy Director of Consolidation District Sultanpur to decide the Revision No. 503 Pankesh Tiwari and others Vs. Rajesh Kumar Maurya and others in proceedings under Section 48 of U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act of the petitioner, pending before the respondent No. 1-Deputy Director of Consolidation District Sultanpur.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1-Deputy Director of Consolidation District Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid application in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1-Deputy Director of Consolidation District Sultanpur is
directed to decide the Revision No. 503 Pankesh Tiwari and others Vs. Rajesh Kumar Maurya and others of the petitioner pending before him, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say, within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur,J)
Order Date :- 10.7.2025/Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench