MOHAMMED AAMIR AND 4 OTHERS v. TEHSILDAR (JUDICIAL), TEHSIL RUDAULI, AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS
A227/4086/2025 · 2025-07-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39760 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4086 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammed Aamir And 4 Others Respondent :- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil Rudauli, Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Nishad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Nishad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Rudauli District Ayodhya to consdier and decide application dated 25.01.2025 for condonaton of delay pending in Mutation Case No. T202404230701501 (Mohammad Samil and another Vs. Jiya Ahmad Kidwai) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously and to quash the ex-parte mutation order dated 24.06.2024 passed in the said case.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Rudauli District Ayodhya to consider and decide the petitioners' restoration application dated 25.01.2025 in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 / Tehsildar (Judicial) Tehsil Rudauli District Ayodhya, is directed to decide petitioners' restoration application dated 25.01.2025 filed in Mutation Case No. T202404230701501 (Mohammad Samil and another Vs. Jiya Ahmad Kidwai) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench