IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 120 Davendra Singh Khokhar State of Haryana and another Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Present: Mr. for Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate, with Mr. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate, for respondent no.2 Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 2023 (erstwhile Section 19.11.2022, registered under Sections 406, 506 of IPC, 1860 (Section 420 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar. 2. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner pray for withdrawal of the present petition. 3. Allowed to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn May 13, 2025 vinod* IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Davendra Singh Khokhar Versus Haryana and another Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate, with Mr. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate, for respondent no.2 **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section (erstwhile Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.), is for 19.11.2022, registered under Sections 406, 506 of IPC, 1860 (Section 420 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner pray for withdrawal of the present petition. Allowed to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3389-2025 (O&M) Decided on:13.05.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Abhilaksh Grover, Advocate, Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. U.K.Agnihotri, Advocate, with Mr. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate, for respondent no.2-complainant. Prayer in the present petition, filed under Section 528 of the BNSS, ), is for quashing the FIR No.503 dated 19.11.2022, registered under Sections 406, 506 of IPC, 1860 (Section 420 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner accordingly. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES (O&M) ...Petitioner ...Respondent BNSS, quashing the FIR No.503 dated 19.11.2022, registered under Sections 406, 506 of IPC, 1860 (Section 420 of IPC added later on), at Police Station Yamuna Nagar Sadar, District Yamuna Nagar. After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.13 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document