Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150492 (ALL)

S.P. MISHRA v. STATE PUBLIC SERVICE TRIBUNAL INDRA BHAWAN LKO. THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS

/5682/2022 · 2025-08-04

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45109-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5682 of 2022 Petitioner :- S.P. Mishra Respondent :- State Public Service Tribunal Indra Bhawan Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Kumar Upadhyay,Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shikhar Anand,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard. 2. We have perused the order passed by the Tribunal on 01.06.2022 in exercise of its contempt jurisdiction. We have also perused the order dated 19.12.2018 passed in Claim Petition No. 1004 of 2018. We do not find any error in the order passed by the contempt Court. Of course, the petitioner can have a grievance against the other order under challenge which is dated 29.03.2022 and has been passed by the State Government. This can be challenged by the petitioner before the Tribunal itself. As this petition was filed on 30.08.2022 within a period of one year of passing of the order dated 29.03.2022, therefore, if a claim petition is filed by the petitioner within one month from today, the same shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation and the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 would be available to the petitioner. Of course, these facts would be disclosed by the petitioner as well our order. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as regards challenge to the order dated 29.03.2022 is concerned. 4. If the claim petition is filed as aforesaid, the Tribunal shall make an endeavour to decide it at the earliest, say, within eight months. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench