[2025:RJ-JP:28131] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6256/2025 Aman Nareda S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 16 Years 06 Months Through Natural Guardian Father Hari Singh Meena S/o Shri Manohar Lal Meena Aged About 38 Years Resident Of 79-A, Saini Colony-1, Kartarpura, Jaipur-302006 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Board Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Ms.Chanchal for Ms.Namita Parihar -Dy.GC. Mr.Naved Rafiq JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:- 1. The respondent Board of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer may be directed to correct accordingly the following entries may be ordered to be corrected: [2025:RJ-JP:28131] (2 of 3) [CW-6256/2025] (I) Name Aman Kumar Nareda may be corrected as Aman Nareda, by way of removing word ‘Kumar’ (ii) The name of the father is presently Hari Singh it should be mentioned as Hari Singh Meena by way of including surname ‘Meena’ (iii) The date of birth presently mentioned as 18.09.2008 it should be corrected as 18.11.2008, in the interest of justice and for that revised mark sheet may be directed to be issued by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan Ajmer, in the interest of justice. 2. Any other appropriate order or direction as deemed fit may be passed in favour of the humble petitioner in the interest of justice.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent-Board to correct his name, his father’s name and date of birth in the mark-sheet of Class-X. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application in this regard was submitted by the petitioner in the office of the respondent-Board on 26.03.2025, but in spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said application has not been decided, by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. Counsel submits that very soon, the examination form of Class-XII will be out, and unless the above desired correction is made by the respondent-Board, the petitioner will not be in a position to submit the correct information in the examination form of Class-XII, therefore, interference of this Court is warranted. [2025:RJ-JP:28131] (3 of 3) [CW-6256/2025] 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner. 6. In the considered opinion of this Court, the application filed by the petitioner with regard to the aforesaid prayer is required to be considered and decided by the respondent-Board by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The respondent-Board cannot be allowed to sit over the matter and keep the application pending for an indefinite period of time. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondent-Board to decide the application of the petitioner expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, without considering the rider that the desired corrections can be considered on or before 31st December every year. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /185