Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150408 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR TEWARI and OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER

A482/5986/2018 · 2025-05-14

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28412 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5986 of 2018 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Tewari And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sharad Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Hemant Tripathi,Sudhakar Mishra,Suresh Chandra Srivastava Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Sharad Pathak, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the order dated 02.07.2018, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Room No. 2, Sultanpur in Criminal Revision No. 329 of 2017, whereby the revision preferred by the revisionist assailing the summoning order dated 17.08.2017, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Room No. 21, Sultanpur passed in Criminal Case No. 129 of 2017, under Sections 504, 506 IPC, Police Station - Kotwali Nagar, District - Sultanpur, has been rejected and the summoning order dated 17.08.2017 has been affirmed. 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application(s) through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks' from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks' and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 8. With above directions this application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench