Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150402 (ALL)

SMT. SHANTI DEVI v. LEARNED SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TARABGANJ, GONDA AND OTHERS

A227/4094/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39629 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4094 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Shanti Devi Respondent :- Learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, Gonda And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Pandey,Shitla Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, District - Gonda to decide Suit No. T- 202308300605674 U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Smt. Poonam and others), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, District - Gonda, is directed to decide Suit No. T-202308300605674 U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Shanti Devi Vs. Smt. Poonam and others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench