IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8834 of 2017 ====================================================== Paras Singh Son of Late Jagdish Singh, resident of Village- Hisua, Police Station- Nautan, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The District Magistrate, Siwan. 3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Siwan. 4. The Dy. Collector Land Reforms, Siwan. 5. The Circle Officer, Ziradei, District- Siwan. 6. The Circle Officer, Mairwa, District- Siwan. 7. Shiv Ratan Ram son of Khedaru Ram, 8. Shiv Jagtan Ram son of Khedaru Ram, 9. Gyanti Devi wife of Late Suresh Ram, 10. Paspati Devi wife of Ram Das Ram, 11. Ram Das Ram son of Late Dwarika Ram, 12. Ram Pukar Ram son of Late Dwarika Ram, 13. Prem Ram son of Sukhari Ram, 14. Munna Ram son of Late Suresh Ram, 15. Shiv Charan Ram son of Late Mukh Lal Ram, 7 to 15 are residents of Village- Hasua Ekla Aam Tola, Police Station- Nautan, District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam- Aag12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 21-04-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): (i) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus to direct the state respondents to protect the ancestral land of petitioner from the illegal and unlawful grabbing activity of the private respondents (7 to 15) who are making all out efforts to disturb the peaceful Patna High Court CWJC No.8834 of 2017(2) dt.21-04-2025 2/2 title and possessions of petitioner to grab the same at the anvil of their illegal muscles power. (ii) To direct the respondent - state authority to protect the title and possession of ancestral property enumerated here under in this application in paragraph of petitioner from the illegal capturing and grabbing activity of private respondents. (iii) To direct the state respondents to restore the rule and law with a view to protect the property under reference of petition. (iv) To hold and declare that state authorities are bound to protect the peaceful legal title and possession of petitioner under Article 21 and 300 A of Constitution of India. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate forum for the redressal of his grievance. 4. Granting liberty and without commenting anything on the merit of the case, the writ petition stand disposed of. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U