ABHISHEK YADAV AND 58 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. (BASIC EDUCATION) LKO. AND 13 OTHERS
WRIA/7365/2025 · 2025-07-09
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38830 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7365 of 2025 Petitioner :- Abhishek Yadav And 58 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. (Basic Education) Lko. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Singh,Kumar Ayush,Net Ram,Prashant Kumar Singh,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav,Rishabh Tripathi,Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Shivam Sharma,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard Shri Durgesh Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel, Ran Vijay Singh learned counsels for the respondents No.2 & 4, Dr Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.13 and Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat,
learned counsel appearing for respondents No.10.
2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being finally decided.
3. Grievance of the petitioners is that despite they have been given additional charge of Head Master of respective institutions, they are not being paid salary for the said post.
4. It is contended that this aspect of the matter has already been considered by this Court in Writ A No.8948 of 2024 in Re: Manoj Kumar and 7 Others Vs. State of U.P. and 4 Others, decided on 01.07.2024
5. Considering the aforesaid, let fresh individual representations be made to the concerned Basic Shiksha Adhikaris within a period of two weeks from today for redressal of their grievances. In case such representations are made, the concerned authority shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the judgment in the case of Manoj Kumar & Ors (supra), if applicable, and pass a reasoned and speaking order within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioners.
Order Date :- 9.7.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench