Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150353 (ALL)

KALLU ZINKU YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

A227/4085/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39797 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4085 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kallu Zinku Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Onkar Nath Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide Computerized Case No. T202204230301483 (Kallu Zinku Yadav Vs. Deep Narayan & others) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2- Nayab Tehsildar, Shashganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2-Nayab Tehsildar, Shashganj, Tehsil - Bikapur, District - Faizabad/Ayodhya, is directed to decide Computerized Case No. T202204230301483 (Kallu Zinku Yadav Vs. Deep Narayan & others) U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench