Vuyyuru Venkata Ram Mohan Rao, v. S Satyanarayana, IAS,
CC/1018/2025 · 2025-09-07
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15034 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15034 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010189602025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1018/2025 Between:
1. VUYYURU VENKATA RAM MOHAN RAO,, S/O. VENKATA PATHI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOOR NO.2- 130-1, GURAZADA VILLAGE, PAMIDIMUKKALA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. S SATYANARAYANA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, B.C WELFARE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI
2. PEEYUS KUMAR IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN THE PETITIONER.
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. A MALLIKARJUNA, DIRECTOR, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR,SRIVISHNUTOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. D K BALAJI IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN THE PETITIONER THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE COMPOUND, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
2
be pleased to pleased to direct the registry to issue the notices to the respondents herein and punish the respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 06.01.2025 made in W.P. No. 22899 of 2024 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVI CHANDAVARAPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following:
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1018/2025
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.01.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22899 of 2024. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondents have complied with the order dated 06.01.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.22899 of 2024 and to that effect written instructions were also furnished. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also admitted the same. Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
08.09.2025 TTPPSS
4
28 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1018/2025
08.09.2025 TTPPSS