RITESH RANA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
A482/5599/2025 · 2025-07-31
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150328 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44713 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5599 of 2025 Applicant :- Ritesh Rana Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Shri Arun Sinha, the learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.5599 of 2025 has been filed by the applicant challenging the orders dated 19.05.2025 passed by the trial Court allowing an application filed by the prosecution separating the trial of Bilal Ahmad, Akhlakh Ahmad, Shakeel Ahamd, Hashim, Ritesh Rana (the applicant) and Rohit Tiwari from other co-accused persons and fixing 27.05.2025 for evidence. The applicant has also challenged the validity of an order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the trial Court rejecting the applicant's application for conducting his trial along with the other accused persons whose trial is proceeding and not with co-accused persons- Bilal Ahmad, Akhlakh Ahmad, Shakeel Ahamd, Hashim and Rohit Tiwari and the warrant issued to whom has been stayed by this court by means of an interim order passed in Criminal Revision No.1408 of 2024. 3. The non-bailable warrant issued against the aforesaid persons were stayed by means of an order dated 03.12.2024 passed by this court in Criminal Revision No.1408 of 2024 filed by them. Therefore, they were not appearing before the trial Court, their trial was not proceeding and the applicant had prayed that his trial be separated from the aforesaid accused persons
summoned along with the applicant and the same be conducted along with other accused persons. 4. Criminal Revision No.1408 of 2024 filed by Bilal Ahmad, Akhlakh Ahmad, Shakeel Ahamd, Hashim and Rohit Tiwari has been dismissed by means of a judgment and order passed today i.e. on 31.07.2025. 5. Now, there is no restraint in progress of the trial against the aforesaid accused persons. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts, the grievance of the applicant raised through the instant application does not survive any more. Accordingly, the instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous. .
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench