1 1024-CP-292-18.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 292 OF 2018 IN WP/4227/2016 SHAMKUMAR MANOHAR KADAM AND OTHERS VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ... Mr. A. S. Jagtap, Advocate h/f Mr. Ravindra K. Shingnapure, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Deepak S. Manorkar, Advocate for Respondent No.4 Mr. Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Learned advocate for petitioners submits that due to passage of time nothing survives in the petition and the same is rendered infructuous. 2. Contempt petition is, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2025:BHC-AUG:28818-DB