Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150308 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR v. DISTT. MAGISTRATE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/6526/2025 · 2025-07-16

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40527 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6526 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Respondent :- Distt. Magistrate Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Beena Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashutosh Shahi Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. The instructions filed today in the Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Ashutosh Shahi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the son of the petitioner had appeared in the physical test for running 800 meters and according to the child, he has been awarded the timing of 3:48 minutes, whereas he had completed the race in a much earlier time. 4. The respondents have argued that in the first test of running of 800 meters, the son of the petitioner had scored 3:54 minutes and in the second test, he had clocked 3:48 minutes. 5. Considering the disputed questions of fact, no interference can be called for in the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. The petitioner would still be entitled to take such appropriate steps as may be prescribed under law. 7. The petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench