Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1503 (UTT)

SUKKHA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/79/2025 · 2025-02-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS Amendment Application (MCRC) No.2 of 2025 In ABA No.79 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. The applicant has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 11.02.2025. Now, Amendment Application (MCRC) No.2 of 2025 has been filed. Heard. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in the bail application, the date of the FIR was wrongly written as 07.01.2025 while it was 11.01.2025. In addition to it, it is argued that in the bail order in para 5, it has wrongly been recorded that the applicant no.1, Sukka Singh, has taken Rs.29 Lakhs from the informant. It is argued that, in fact, it is Rs.29,000/-. In so far as correction in the bail order in para 5 is concerned, that may not be done. What happened on that date that has been recorded in the bail order. State counsel has not moved any application for correction. Therefore, on that aspect correction may not be permitted. In so far as the correction of date in the bail application is concerned, to that extent, the correction application is allowed. Let amended memo of bail application be filed. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.03.2025 Sanjay