Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1503 (PNJ)

SONU AND OTHERS v. SUDHIR RAJPAL, IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/6163/2025 · 2026-01-22

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 113 Sonu and o Sh. Sudhir of Medica Secretaria CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated of this Cou of Haryana following o COCP-6163-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.6163 o Date of decision and others Versus udhir Rajpal, IAS, Additional Chi edical Education and Research De etariat, Sector-1, Chandigarh and an AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Namit Gautam, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitio eedings be initiated against the respon r dated 02.9.2025 (Annexure P-1) pass is Court in CWP-5680-2024 titled as aryana and others”, whereby the pet wing observations :- “…In view thereof, the petitioners' participatio 11.03.2024 in respons question is declared va law. Consequently, th appointment on the ba respondents are acco 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6163 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-22.01.2026 …..Petitioners l Chief Secretary, Department ch Department, Haryana Civil and another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate dl. A.G., Haryana. petitioners submits that contempt respondent for not complying the ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench led as “Sonu and others vs. State he petition was allowed with the the petition is allowed, and the pation in the interview held on ponse to the advertisement in d valid and in accordance with , they are held entitled to e basis of selection made. The accordingly directed to offer VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.23 18.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits tha been comp contempt p the petition January 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-6163-2025 (O & M) appointments to those o been selected, in acc subject to fulfilling o within a period of tw certified copy of the ord At the very outset learned c its that the Writ Court order dated 02. complied with, therefore, nothing empt petition and the same may be disp In view of the submissions m etitioners, the present contempt petitio Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 22, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 ose of the petitioners who have accordance with merit and g other requisite conditions, of two weeks of receiving a order.” rned counsel for the petitioners 02.9.2025 (Annexure P-1) has othing survives in the present be disposed of. ons made by learned counsel for petition is disposed of. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.23 18.06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document