Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15026 (UTT)

AMIT AGRAWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3131/2025 · 2025-11-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.3131 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sudhir Nailwal, S.C. for the State. 3. Ms. Ananya Jain, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for respondent nos.2, 3 and 4. 4. After arguing for a while learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will move an application for change of user before the District Level Development Authority Board for the reason that earlier the building was being used for commercial purpose and mistakenly permission for construction was obtained for residential building. 5. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands disposed of finally; however the petitioner is permitted to move such an application before the District Level Development Officer for conversion of the user of the property within ten days from today. Till then the impugned order shall be kept in abeyance. 6. Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to counsel for the parties, today itself, on payment of usual charges. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.11.2025 SK