Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150247 (ALL)

SANTOSH AND 3 OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DIVISION, LUCKNOW,UP AND 15 OTHERS

A227/4032/2025 · 2025-07-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39296 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4032 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh And 3 Others Respondent :- Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow,Up And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalla Ji Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey has accepted notice on behalf of respondent No.15- Gram Sabha. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow to decide petitioner's interim relief application pending in appeal No. C 202510000002488 (Santosh and others Vs. Suresh Prakash and others) under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow is directed to decide petitioner's interim relief application pending in appeal No. C 202510000002488 (Santosh and others Vs. Suresh Prakash and others) under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously say within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the authority concerned in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned , if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench