Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CR-5607-2017 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.04.2025 JUJHAR SINGH AND ANR ..Petitioners Versus SATINDER KAUR AND ORS ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)
1. The petitioner herein is a judgment debtor. An ex parte decree of possession by way of specific performance of the agreement to sell was passed against the petitioners. They filed application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to set aside ex parte decree, which admittedly has been dismissed. The petitioners have filed first appeal. In the execution proceedings, the warrants of possession were issued. Admittedly, there is no stay in favour of the petitioners before the First Appellate Court.
2. Hence, the Executing Court is required to proceed with the matter.
3. Consequently, the revision petition is dismissed.
4. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of. April 03rd, 2025
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ayub
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.04.05 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.