IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1367 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Jisahulla @ Jisaullah Son of Motim Mian, Resident of Village- Rampur Charghan, P.O. and P.S.- Turukaulia, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Patna. 3. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 4. The District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 5. The District Programme Officer, Secondary, East Champaran at Motihari. 6. The Block Education Officer, Turukaulia, East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadaw (Gp23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 5 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the peti- tioner has approached this Court for quashing of the Office or- der contained in Memo No.89, dated 05.05.2022, issued by the District Programme Officer, Secondary Education and Literacy, East Champaran at Motihari, whereby and whereunder the peti- tioners’ salary/stipend from 06.12.2014 till date as Talim Markaj date has been denied on the ground that the petitioner did not have requisite qualification of Intermediate at the time of ap- pointment. The petitioner further prays to make payment of salary/stipend of Talim Markaj from 06.12.2014 till date to peti- Patna High Court CWJC No.1367 of 2023(5) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 tioner and make payment of salary/stipend on month to month basis and also grant any other reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled to. 3. Considering the reliefs sought by the petitioner, petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of this order and other supporting documents, before the respon- dent no.4 within a period of four weeks and the respondent no.4 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose of the representation of the petitioner after affording an opportu- nity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a rea- soned and speaking order in accordance with law within four weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the peti- tioner. 4. It is made clear that respondent no.4 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period. 5. With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of. shikha/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U