BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD) NOs. 11777 , 11780 and 11793 of 2025 Mohamed Hanifa Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District. Crime No. 19/2010 Respondent(s) Prayer: C-24AB. To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in connection with C.C No. 444/2018 in Cr No. 19/2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkottai. CRL OP(MD) NO. 11780 of 2025 Mohamed Hanifa Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District. Crime No. 26/2010 Respondent(s) Prayer: C-24AB. To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No.26/2010 on the file of the respondent Police. CRL OP(MD) NO. 11793 of 2025 Mohamed Hanifa Petitioner(s) Vs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District. Crime No. 27/2010 Respondent(s) Prayer: C-24AB. To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in connection with C.C No. 452/2018 in Cr.No.27/2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkottai. In all cases: For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Anandakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.side) COMMON ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.19 of 2010, under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.26 of 2010 and under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.27 of 2010, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had cheated the defacto complainants by receiving money stating that he would get them a job in abroad. Hence, the apprehension of arrest. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence. Further, the petitioner is facing health issues. Hence, he is not able to appear before the Trial Court. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature. Further, it is a case https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis of jump out bail. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is directing the petitioner to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkottai. The petitioner shall submit a bail application before the learned Judicial Magistrate. On such submission, the learned Judicial Magistrate shall consider the bail application in accordance to law on merits on the same date. 6.With the above said directions, the criminal original petitions are disposed of. 7.Post the cases on 07.11.2025 "for reporting compliance". 13-10-2025 Tmg Note: Issue order copy on 13.10.2025. To 1. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukottai District. 2.Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pudukkottai. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis