UNION BANK OF INDIA Versus TOTA RAM ALIAS TOTU RAM CRMPM-3049 of 2025 02.04.2026 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Durga Singh Kainthla, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent. CRMPM-3049 of 2025 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/ appellant for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying appeal, which is barred by limitation. Pursuant to notices issued in the instant application, Mr. Durga Singh Kainthla, Advocate, has filed Power of Attorney on behalf of non-applicant/respondent. He fairly states that he does not intend to file reply, as such, this Court may pass appropriate orders. Having carefully perused the averments contained in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, this Court finds no impediment in accepting the prayer, especially when delay caused in maintaining accompanying appeal does not appear to be intentional or willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, the same deserves to be condoned. In view of above, delay, which has been otherwise sufficiently explained is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr. Appeal No. _________ of 2026 (Cr.A(A-SB) ST11746/2025) Be registered. Admit. Notice. Mr. Durga Singh Kainthla, Advocate, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondent. List of hearing in due course. In the meanwhile, record of learned Court below be called for. April 02, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge