SAUD AHAMAD KHAN AND 3 OTHERS v. NAYAB TAHSILDAR TAHSIL MILKIPUR DISTRICT AYODHYA AND 6 OTHERS
A227/4019/2025 · 2025-07-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38699 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4019 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saud Ahamad Khan And 3 Others Respondent :- Nayab Tahsildar Tahsil Milkipur District Ayodhya And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kinkar Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1-Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya to decide case No.5801/2022, computerized case No.T-202204230405801 (Saud Ahmad Khan and others Vs. Bajrang Singh an others) filed under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Nayab Tehsildar, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.5801/2022, computerized case No.T-202204230405801 (Saud Ahmad Khan and others Vs. Bajrang Singh and others) expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the
petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 8.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench