Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150182 (ALL)

AJAY SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4059/2025 · 2025-07-10

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39407 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4059 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for a direction to respondent No.2-The Chairman Rajshwa Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow to decide the Revision No. 855/2021 computerized Case No. R2021053100855 Syayad Touheed Ali and others vs. Ajay Singh and others of the petitioner, pending before the respondent No.2-The Chairman Rajshwa Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow . 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.2- The Chairman Rajshwa Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2-The Chairman Rajshwa Parishad (Board of Revenue), Lucknow is directed to decide the Revision No. 855/2021 computerized Case No. R2021053100855 Syayad Touheed Ali and others vs. Ajay Singh and others of the petitioner pending before him, after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties, expeditiously, say, within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur,J.) Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench