SA No. 698 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA SA No. 698 of 2009 and MP.No.1 of 2009 1. Kaliyaperumal Naidu S/o. Pakkirisamy Naidu Senthanadu Village Ulundurpet Tk. Appellant(s) Vs 1. KUPPUSAMY NAIDU(died) S/o. Pakkirisamy Naidu Senthanadu Village Ulundurpet Tk. 2.KOUSALYA W/o. Srinivasa Naidu No 11 Kavarai Street Kallakurichi Tk Senthanadu Post Ulundurpet Tk. 3.Saraswathy Ammal W/o. Govindarajulu Naidu Vijayankuppam 4.JOTHILINGAM(died) S/o. Veeramuthu Harijan Colony https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 698 of 2009 Kalathur. 5.DHANDAPANI S/o. Vridhachalam Harijan Colony Kalathur. 6.Chakrapani Konar S/o. Govindaraju Audikuzhi. 7.RAJARAM S/o. Kuppusamy Naidu, Senthanadu Village, Ulunderpet Tk, Villupuram Dist. 8.JEEVARATHINAM W/o. Jothilingam. 8 To 10 Respts Are Residing At Senthanadu Village, Ulunderpet Tk, Villupuram Dist 9.RAJKUMAR S/o. Jothilingam. 10.RADHIKA D/o. Jothilingam. [R1 Died, R7 Is Brought On Record As Lr Of The Deceased R1.R4 Died, RR8 To 10 Are Brought On Record As Lrs Of The Deceased R4 Vide Court Order Dated 07/08/2025 Made In Cmp.nos.602,603,604,605,606 And 607 Of 2016 In Sa.no.698 Of 2009(cvkj)] Respondent(s) PRAYER: This second appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgement and the decree dated 22.10.2008 passed in AS.No.10/2004 on the file of Principal District Court, Villupuram confirming the judgment and the decree dated 15.10.2003 passed in OS.NO.206/96 before the Sub Court, Kallakurichi. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 698 of 2009 For Appellant(s): M/s.A.Nilapher for M/s. R. Meenal For Respondent(s): M/s.V.Srimathi for RR2,3,5 and 6 JUDGEMENT The appellant/plaintiff, who had filed the appeal, died on 13.12.2022 and no steps have been taken so far. Though steps were taken consequent to the death of respondents 1 and 4, no progress can be made unless the legal heirs of the deceased appellant are impleaded as appellants. 2.Since no steps have been taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, the appeal stands abated. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed as unnecessary. 02-09-2025 jrs Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 698 of 2009 SA No. 698 of 2009 R.N.MANJULA J. jrs To 1. The Principal District Court, Villupuram. 2.The Sub Court, Kallakurichi. SA No. 698 of 2009 andMP.NO.1/2009 02-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis