RAM SHARAN RAWAT v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION BARABANKI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIB/639/2025 · 2025-07-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39172 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 639 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Sharan Rawat Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation Barabanki And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel on behalf of respondent No.s 1 and 2 while Sri Mohan Singh is present for respondent No.3- Gaon Sabha.
2. It has been stated that the petitioner had moved an objection under Section 9 A (2) of Consolidation of Holdings Act regarding gata No.431 (old gata No.259) area 0.243 hectare situated in Village Dhaurmau, Pargana Deva, Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barabanki for correcting the revenue records and including the name of the petitioner. Since his application was not considered and decided and accordingly present writ petition praying for a direction to the Consolidation Officer, Sadar, District Barabanki to decide his application dated 8.4.2025.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents have informed this Court that consolidation operations have already ceased in light of the notification under Section 52 (1) of U.P. C.H. Act sometime in 1995 and accordingly after conclusion of the said proceedings no fresh proceedings can be initiated under the said Act. It was further stated that grievance to that effect can be raised by the petitioner under the provisions of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submtis that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application under the Revenue Code.
5. In light of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed giving liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate applicaditon for redressal of his grievance under the provisions of Revenue Code. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench