Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150169 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

NABAIL/828/2025 · 2025-07-10

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39416 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 828 of 2025 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Ojha,Dilip Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 218 of 2024, under sections 74, 351(3), 352 of B.N.S.; Sections 9-C, 9-F, 9-M of POCSO Act; and Sections 3(1)w, 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha, 3(2) (va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Jethwara, District Pratapgarh. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be directed to be decided expeditiously in terms of the judgement of the Apex Court rendered in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. Liberty is granted to the applicant to appear/surrender before the learned trial court within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and in case, he files a regular bail application, the same be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid down in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Shravan Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench