Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15016 (KAR)

KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA v. SRI. ARUN PRABHA

WP/3939/2024 · 2025-04-21

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16419 WP No. 3939 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 3939 OF 2024 (GM-KLA) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MALLIKARJUN REDDY K S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. ARUN PRABHA. AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. ERSTWHILE TAHSILDAR, T NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571110. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO- QUASH THE ORDER DTD 17.11.2022 PASSED BY THE R1/DGO, AS PER ANNEXURE-AAWARD THE COST OF THIS WRIT PETITION THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16419 WP No. 3939 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court on 03.03.2025 had passed the following order:- "Finally, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. In the event, office objections are not complied, petition would be dismissed for its non- prosecution." 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 260