RAJARAM YADAV ALIAS NIRALA JI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(DB)/603/2025 · 2025-06-23
Ambuj Nath, Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15016 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15016 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:16495-DB )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 603 of 2025
Rajaram Yadav @ Nirala Ji ---- --- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand
….
--- Respondent
--- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Appellant: Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Resp.-State: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. … 02 / 23.06.2025 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, learned Spl. P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau at Daltonganj in M.C.A. No. 417 of 2025 in connection with S.T.No. 167 of 2022, arising out of Harriharganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2004 whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.
3. It has been alleged that land mines were exploded by the extremists and the telephone exchange was also set on fire.
4. Submission has been advanced by the learned Counsel for the appellant that the appellant is in custody since 18.01.2019. It has further been submitted that the land mines blast did not cause any injury and the appellant has been implicated primarily on the basis of suspicion.
5. Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant.
6. Regard being had to the manner of implication of the appellant and the period of custody undergone by him, we, while setting aside the order dated 25.04.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 417 of 2025 in connection with S.T. No. 167 of 2022, arising out of Harriharganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2004 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau at Daltonganj, direct that the appellant, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees
2
Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau in Sessions Trial No. 167 of 2022, arising out of Harriharganj P.S. Case No. 18 of 2004.
7. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
(Ambuj Nath, J)
P.K.S.