Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150155 (MAD)

V.Murugan v. The Government of Tamil Nadu

WP(MD)/19009/2025 · 2025-07-14

Vivek Kumar Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.19009 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD) No.19009 of 2025 V.Murugan : Petitioner Vs. 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600009. 2. The Convener, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai - 625021. 3. The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai - 625021. : Respondents P RAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to direct the Respondent No.3 to revoke the order of suspension of the Petitioner by considering the representation dated 24.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karthik M/s.Roy and Roy Associates For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.19009 of 2025 Government Advocate for R1 Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy for R2 & R3 O R D E R This writ petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to direct the third respondent to revoke the order of suspension of the petitioner by considering his representation dated 24.04.2025. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to the registration of a criminal case against the petitioner, he was placed under suspension in the year 2018. Subsequently, the criminal case ended in an acquittal. Therefore, the petitioner now seeks to have his suspension revoked. The learned counsel further submitted that, although several grounds have been raised in the writ petition, it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.19009 of 2025 4. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.04.2025, taking into account the fact that the petitioner has already been acquitted, on its own merits and in accordance with law, and to pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 14.07.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.19009 of 2025 To 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600009. 2. The Convener, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai - 625021. 3. The Registrar, Madurai Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai - 625021. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.19009 of 2025 VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. PKN W.P.(MD) No.19009 of 2025 14.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis