Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15015 (HP)

Devi Singh v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/4105/2020 · 2025-06-05

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Gulaba Ram (since deceased) through LRs Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. CWP No.4105 of 2020 26.09.2025 Present: Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. While placing on record copy of office order dated 19.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Registrar, HP PWD, Shimla, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be complied, stands duly complied with. Having carefully perused aforesaid office order, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the afore contention of learned Additional Advocate General. In terms of aforesaid order, petitioners claim for pension has been considered subject to the final outcome of curative petition filed by the State in Balo Devi’s case. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the aforesaid compliance are released, expeditiously, preferably within four weeks. September 26, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil) Judge