Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150123 (ALL)

SMT. GAURAVATI v. THE BOARD OF REVENUE THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN U.P. AT LKO. AND 19 OTHERS

A227/4036/2025 · 2025-07-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39193 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4036 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Gauravati Respondent :- The Board Of Revenue Thru. Its Chairman U.P. At Lko. And 19 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Verma,Deepansi,Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava,Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 -Board of Revenue through its Chairman, U.P. at Lucknow to decide Revision No.1041 of 2010-11, computerized No.R2011041700043910 (Smt. Kailasho and another Vs. Afsar Ali and others) under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue through its Chairman, U.P. at Lucknow is directed to decide Revision No.1041 of 2010-11, computerized No.R2011041700043910 (Smt. Kailasho and another Vs. Afsar Ali and others) under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned , if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench