Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15012 (JHR)

RIZWAN ALAM MD RIZWAN ALAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4958/2025 · 2025-06-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:16780 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4958 of 2025 ------ Rizwan Alam @ Md. Rizwan Alam, aged about 29 years, son of Ajmat Miyan, resident of Rahmat Nagar, Toto, P.S.-Gumla, and Post Office-Gumla, District-Gumla. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Haider Ali, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.423 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No.72 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 309(4) and 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted 7 to 8 lakhs as well as the jwellery from the house of the informant and upon the discloser statement of the petitioner, 10 currency notes of Rs.500/- and one pair of Payal and one pair of toe ring and one country made pistol has been recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is also involved in 3 other cases including another case of dacoity. It is next submitted that no T.I.P. has been conducted as yet. It is next submitted that the co-accused has been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 08.04.2025 in B.A. No.1564 of 2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.12.2024 as has been mentioned in para-11 of this bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Session Judge-III, Gumla in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.423 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. Case No.72 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/