HARSHIT SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
NA528/730/2025 · 2025-07-11
Subhash Vidyarthi
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150118 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39743 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 730 of 2025 Applicant :- Harshit Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Nigam,Aadi Nigam,Ajit Kumar Nishad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Nigam, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Shikhar Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 528 BNSS., has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in two cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submits separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows:
"i. Case Crime No. 524 of 2024, under Sections 303(a), 331(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow, ii. Case Crime No. 547 of 2024, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Krishna Nagar Extension, District Lucknow, and iii. Case Crime No. 548 of 2024, under Sections 317(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS, Police Station Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow."
4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant
that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Preeti.
Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench