DR RAVISHEKAR REDDY CHINNASIGARI v. SRI SUDHAR REDDY SINCE DEAD BY LRS MRS.ARUNA.P
WP/3006/2025 · 2025-04-09
H T Narendra Prasad
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15011 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15011 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15208 WP No. 3006 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3006 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
DR RAVISHEKAR REDDY CHINNASIGARI S/O. LATE NANDHAMUNI REDDY CHINNASIGARI AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.18-1-4/C RAMACHANDRA NAGAR.
K.T.ROAD, TIRUPATI URBAN TIRUPATI DISTRICT ANDRAPRADESH-517501. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMACHANDRA H., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI SUDHAR REDDY SINCE DEAD BY LRS MRS.ARUNA.P W/O.LATE G.SUDHAKAR REDDY AGED BOUT 45 YEARS
2.
MS.HARSHITHA S REDDY D/O.LATE G.SUDHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
3.
SMT.HARIKAA S REDDY D/O LATE G.SUDHAKAR REDDY AGED BOUT 20 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT NO.126 NEAR PALOTTI NILAYAM KALYAN NAGAR CHELEKERE. BENGALURU-560043.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15208 WP No. 3006 of 2025
4. SMT.JAYALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS D/O.LATE MUNISWAMY REDDY @ ABBAIAH REDDY R/AT 2ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS ANNAIAH REDDY LAYOUT HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD NEAR S.S.PARADISE APARTMENT BENGALURU-560043.
5.
M/S.VEERA YOGA MEDICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTRE PVT. LTD..
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.88 MARATHAHALLI, OUTER RING ROAD BENGALURU-560037.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR.K.M.VEERAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O. LATE MUNIREDDY
6. SRI.LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O. LATE VENKATARAMANA R/AT HOUSE NO.1058 10TH MAIN, 100 FT. ROAD HRBR 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VIJAY KUMAR PRAKASH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI K R BHARDWAJ, ADVCOATE FOR C/RESPONDENTS)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE
ORDER PASSED BY 43RD CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-44) IN O.S.NO.8893/2017 DATED 20.11.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ALLOW THE PETITIONER AS DEFENDANT NO.4 IN O.S.NO.8893/2017 ON THE FILE OF 43RD ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,BENGALURU (CCH-44) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15208 WP No. 3006 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner-impleading applicant, challenging the order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the XLIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru on application filed by the impleading applicant under Order I Rule 10(1) of CPC in O.S.No.8893/2017, whereby the trial Court has rejected the said application.
2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for specific performance of contract. During the pendency of the suit, the impleading applicant purchased the property in question from defendant No.3 through a registered Sale Deed dated 16.11.2023. Therefore, he claims to have an interest in the property in question. Thereafter, the impleading applicant filed an application under Order I Rule 10(1) of the CPC seeking to be impleaded as a party to the suit. The trial Court, by the impugned order, rejected the said application on the ground that he had not
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15208 WP No. 3006 of 2025
produced the copy of the Sale Deed through which he claims title over the suit schedule property.
3. The impleading applicant has filed a memo along with the registered Sale Deed dated 16.11.2023 for the first time before this Court. Since the petitioner has an interest in the suit schedule property, in the interest of justice and in order to protect his interest in the subject property, the petitioner is entitled to be impleaded as a party to the suit.
4. At this stage, the learned counsel for the plaintiff- respondent has submitted that since the suit is now at the stage of the evidence of the defendants, the trial Court may be directed to dispose of the suit, as expeditiously as possible.
5. Accordingly, I pass the following order:
ORDER a) The writ petition is allowed.
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15208 WP No. 3006 of 2025
b) The order dated 20.11.2024 passed by the XLIII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru on application filed by the impleading applicant under
Order I Rule 10(1) of CPC in O.S.No.8893/2017, is set aside. c) Application filed by the impleading applicant under
Order I Rule 10(1) of CPC is hereby allowed. The impleading applicant is permitted to come on record as defendant. d) The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit, in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible, not later than nine months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8