Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15010 (RAJ)

ARUN KUMAR S/O CHHITARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4946/2025 · 2025-04-16

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16237] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4946/2025 Arun Kumar S/o Chhitarmal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Chatarpura, P.s. Uniara, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk, District Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5017/2025 Devendra @ Gopal S/o Shri Mahavir @ Sitaram, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Jajawar, P.s. Nainwa, Currently At Ward No. 06, Nainwa, District Bundi (Rajasthan). (At Present Lodge At District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena Ms. Rekha Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/04/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0058/2025 registered at Police Station-Sadar Tonk, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 109(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amended 2019). Since both the bail applications have arisen [2025:RJ-JP:16237] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4946/2025] from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence even in FIR no allegations were levelled against them. Petitioners are behind the bars since 11.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Arun Kumar S/o Chhitarmal and Devendra @ Gopal S/o Shri Mahavir @ Sitaram shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/221-222