Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15008 (KAR)

RAMKY ENVIRO ENGINEER LIMITED v. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD

WP/21966/2017 · 2025-01-15

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1484 WP No. 21966 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 21966 OF 2017 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: RAMKY ENVIRO ENGINEER LIMITED, COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT RAMKY HOUSE, SITE NO.25-30, 2ND CROSS, RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, DR. HEMANTH RAJKUMAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARAYANA RAO., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESWARA.P.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, 4TH & 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1484 WP No. 21966 of 2017 KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.B.PATIL & ASSOCIATES., FOR C/R2 AND R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Narayana Rao., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajeswara.P.N., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Narayana Rao., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner and if an order is passed, they will not seek for recalling the order or file review petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1484 WP No. 21966 of 2017 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44