ASHISH NAMDEV v. DIRECTOR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE
WPSS/1247/2025 · 2025-10-28
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15007 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15007 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:9446 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/1247/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Himanshu Vaidik,
learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, Advocate holding brie of Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent-IIT, Roorkee.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of writ petition, IIT, Roorkee has agreed to grant lien to petitioner for a period of one year, therefore, the relief, sought in the writ petition, does not survive.
4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
28.10.2025 Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.10.28 01:47:28 -07'00'
2025:UHC:9446