SMT. ROLI TIWARI @ ROLI MAHESH TIWARI v. TEHSILDAR TEHSIL -MILKIPUR DISTT. AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/3999/2025 · 2025-07-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38538 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3999 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Roli Tiwari @ Roli Mahesh Tiwari Respondent :- Tehsildar Tehsil -Milkipur Distt. Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Arjun Gupta,Onkar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1/Tehsildar, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya to decide the restoration / recall application dated 19.10.2024 pending in Case No. 4108 of 2024 and computer case No. T-202404230404108 (Smt. Roli Vs. Ramjag) arising out of application for mutation U/S 34 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and also prayed for expeditious disposal of Case No. 4108 of 2024 and computer case No. T-202404230404108 (Smt. Roli Vs. Ramjag) arising out of application for mutation U/S 34 of U.P.Revenue Code,
2006.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 1/Tehsildar, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1/Tehsildar, Tehsil - Milkipur, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide restoration / recall application dated 19.10.2024 pending in Case No. 4108 of 2024 and computer case No. T-202404230404108 (Smt. Roli Vs. Ramjag) arising out of application for mutation U/S 34 of U.P.Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, say, within a period of
four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further provided that in case the aforesaid restoration / recall application is decided in favour of petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to move an application for expediting the Case No. 4108 of 2024 and computer case No. T- 202404230404108 (Smt. Roli Vs. Ramjag) arising out of application for mutation U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
8. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
9. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench