Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15006 (AP)

MOHAMMAD YOUNIS BAIG v. MADATURU SRINIVASA RAO

CRP/1075/2023 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010187702023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1075/2023 Between: 1. MOHAMMAD YOUNIS BAIG, S/O LATE KHADIR BAIG AGED 48 YEARS, OCCU. TAILOR R/O. MIG II 266, RAJEV NAGAR KURMANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MADATURU SRINIVASA RAO, S/o Chellayya Aged 35 years, R/o. 31-23-20/3 Bharat Nagar, I.T.I Road Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam - 530046 ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dated 13.02.2023 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.174 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge At Gajuwaka and allow the I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.174 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge At Gajuwaka in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 174 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Gajuwaka, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 13.02.2023 passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in O.S.No.174 of 2017 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gajuwaka. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 366 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1075 of 2023 11th July, 2025 cbn