Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15005 (KAR)

PULKIT PARASHAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1299/2025 · 2025-03-17

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11268 CRL.P No. 1299 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1299 OF 2025 BETWEEN: PULKIT PARASHAR, C/O LAXMIKANT PARASHAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT NO.20/91, 6TH A MAIN, 10TH C CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, NAGAPURA, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 086. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, STATE BY PEENYA PS, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. DEEPANSHU AGARWAL, S/O.NAVEEN AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.404, PUZZLES LIVING BRAVADO HOUSE, HMT LAYOUT, VENUGOPALNAGAR, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560 071. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANOP KUMAR M.V, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. NIKHIL K.P, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGESHEET FILED Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11268 CRL.P No. 1299 of 2025 AGAINST THIS PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.42528/2024 (CR.NO.496/2024) OF HE PEENYA POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 326(f),324(1) OF BNS ACT PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXXI ADDL. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT AT BANGALORE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner/accused, who has been charge- sheeted for offenses punishable under Sections 326(f) and 324(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, has approached this Court seeking appropriate relief. 2. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner damaged property belonging to the complainant, causing a loss of ₹50,000. However, both parties are present before this Court and have filed a compromise petition, stating that they have amicably resolved the dispute. As per the terms of the settlement, the complainant has agreed to withdraw all allegations against the petitioner and has no objection to quashing the impugned proceedings. 3. The compromise petition, along with the joint affidavit, has been placed on record. 4. Since the complainant has agreed to withdraw all allegations and has expressed no objection to the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11268 CRL.P No. 1299 of 2025 quashing of proceedings, it would be futile to subject the petitioner to trial, as the probability of conviction is remote and bleak in light of the settlement. Under these circumstances, the continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to an abuse of the process of law. 5. Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER i. The criminal petition is allowed. ii. The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.42528/2024 pending on the file of XXXI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Bangalore insofar it relates to the petitioner/accused is hereby quashed. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 146 CT: BHK