Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150044 (ALL)

GANGA RAM AND 2 OTHERS v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL ) AYODHYA AND ANOTHER

A227/3991/2025 · 2025-07-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38690 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3991 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ganga Ram And 2 Others Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial ) Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division Ayodhya to decide the interim application pending in Revision No. 682/2025, Computerized 'Case No. C202504000000682 (Shri Keshan and ohers Vs. Bachana) U/S 219 of L.R. Act, expeditiously and for a direction to respondents not to alienate the property during the pendency of the revision. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent No. 2/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid interim application in the time bound manner or on the next date fixed in the matter i.e. 21.07.2025 . 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 2/ Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division Ayodhya, is directed to decide interim application pending in Revision No. 682/2025, Computerized 'Case No. C202504000000682 (Shri Keshan and ohers Vs. Bachana) U/S 219 of L.R. Act on the next date fixed in the matter which according to the petitioner is 21.07.2025 or within a period of three weeks thereafter in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench