M/S AJAY SALES AND SUPPLIERS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/5941/2022 · 2025-03-20
Sudesh Bansal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15001 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15001 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:12682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5940/2022 M/s Anuj Associates, Shop No. 1, 20-A, 22 Godam, Sudarshanpura Industrial Area, Jaipur, A Proprietorship Concern, Through Its Proprietor, Smt. Manorma Jain W/o Shri K.P. Jain, R/o 30, Indraprasth Colony, Ram Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Co-operative, Secretariat, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary.
2. Rajasthan Co-Operative Dairy Federation Limited (RCDF), Saras Sankul, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.), Through Its Managing Director.
3. Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur-15, Through Its Managing Director. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5941/2022 M/s Ajay Sales And Suppliers, Shop No. 2, 20-A, 22 Godam, Sudarshanpura Industrial Area, Jaipur, A Proprietorship Concern, Through Its Proprietor, Kanwar Pal Jain S/o Late Shri Pyare Lal Jain, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 30, Indraprasth Colony, Ram Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Co-Operative, Secretariat, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary.
2. Rajasthan Co-Operative Dairy Federation Limited (Rcdf), Saras Sankul, JLN Marg, Jaipur (Raj.), Through Its Managing Director.
3. Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited, Near Gandhi Nagar Railway Station, Jaipur-15, Through Its Managing Director. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sohan Sharma for Mr. Arvind Gupta For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:12682] (2 of 2) [CW-5940/2022] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 20/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the writ petitions have become infructuous, therefore, they do not press the writ petitions.
2. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as not press.
3. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /20-21