Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 149985 (MAD)

T.Radhakrishnan v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/19998/2025 · 2025-07-24

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 T.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.Sub Registrar, Rajakkamangalam, Kanyakumari. 4. G.Sarasagopal 5. G.Govindarajan 6. S.Sasikala ...Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent District Collector to hand over the keys of the Temple to the rightful and legal administrators of Arulmigu Pannayan Thoppu Isakkiamman Temple, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 11.09.2024. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth For R1 to R3 : Mr.K.S.Selvaganasan Additional Government Pleader ***** ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent District Collector to hand over the keys of the Temple to the rightful and legal administrators of Arulmigu Pannayan Thoppu Isakkiamman Temple, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 11.09.2024. 2.The petitioner is claiming right over the temple as well as the respondents 4 to 6 are also claiming right over the temple. Instead of approaching the appropriate Civil Court for framing any scheme to administer the temple. Both the parties are approaching either the police officials or the revenue officials. Both the police as well as the revenue officials are not having any power to resolve the dispute among the petitioner and the individual respondents. Therefore, the writ petition cannot be made entertained. 3.The petitioner and the other rival group are directed to hand over the keys to the official respondents. The petitioner and the individual respondents are at liberty to approach the appropriate Civil Court for framing the scheme. Until the scheme is framed, the petitioner, the individual respondents, ie., the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 other rival group are not entitled to have the keys of the temple. 4.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 24.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Tmg To 1.The District Collector Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 3.Sub Registrar, Rajakkamangalam, Kanyakumari. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY , J. Tmg ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.19998 of 2025 DATED : 24.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis