SAROJNI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/6190/2025 · 2025-07-14
Manish Kumar, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149982 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39990-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6190 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarojni Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Phal,Neelam Kumari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for State respondents. Present writ petition is filed by petitioner for the following primary relief:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS Petitioner thereby commanding the opp. Parties No. 2 7 3 to lodge the FIR against the opp. Party no. 4 to 8 in an appropriate sections." The petitioner is aggrieved by non-lodging of the FIR at his behest. In view of the law settled by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in (2021) 2 ADJ 86, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioner is aggrieved by non- lodging of the FIR, therefore, he has appropriate remedy of filing a complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. or under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 14.7.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench