Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38545 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3989 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Respondent :- The Court Addl. Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division Ayodhya And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ganga Prasad,Abhishek Shukla,Ram Achal Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. . 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 164 of 2024, Computerized Case No. C202404000000164 (Mangesh Kumar Vs. Santosh Kumar and others), U/s 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that trial Court/competent authority may be directed to decide the Revision No. 164 of 2024, Computerized Case No. C202404000000164 (Mangesh Kumar Vs. Santosh Kumar and others), U/s 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in a time bound manner. 6. At this stage, no ground for urgency is made out by the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the trial Court/competent authority and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 164 of 2024, Computerized Case No. C202404000000164 (Mangesh Kumar Vs. Santosh Kumar and others), U/s 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the trial Court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench