SMT. KUSUM AND 3 OTHERS v. SRI PRATHMESH KUMAR, VICE CHAIRMAN LKO. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LKO. AND ANOTHER
CAPL/2025/2025 · 2025-08-27
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 149952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2025 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Compliance affidavit has been filed by respondent nos.1 and 2, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicants has very fairly submitted that the
judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and, for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty may be given to the applicants to file a case for enhancement of compensation. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. The applicants are always at liberty to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law for which no liberty is required to be granted by the contempt court. August 27, 2025 Mahesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Yadav, Somesh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ratnesh Chandra (Manish Kumar,J.) Smt. Kusum And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) Sri Prathmesh Kumar, Vice Chairman Lko. Development Authority Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench